Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0029822 AI generated

Court distinguishes between substantive and instrumental parts of an initial petition under CPC Art. 467.

Case Number 0029822
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa upheld the admissibility of the initial petition, distinguishing between its substantive and instrumental components. The author presented factual allegations as the basis for the action while separately providing a perspective for the judge's specification. The court ruled that both parts serve distinct functions and are validly included in the procedural document.

Legislator headnote

Official

PETIÇÃO INICIAL

Keywords

AI generated
initial petition structure substantive vs instrumental CPC Article 467 procedural admissibility factual allegations judicial specification civil procedure Lisbon

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC67 Art. 467

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00021198

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199002010029822

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/1223727D581663D680256803000341AF?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A petição inicial contém duas partes com funções perfeitamente distintas:

- uma primeira, substancial, em que o autor expõe os factos e as razões de direito que servem de fundamento à acção;

- Uma outra com função meramente instrumental em que o autor colabora com o Juiz dando a sua perspectiva sobre os factos que deverão ser levados à especificação e ao questionário.