Insurance contract clauses interpreted as material facts by the court, overriding the lower court's review.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Justice upheld the lower court's interpretation of insurance contract clauses regarding work accident liability. The parties argued that the specific wording of the policy defined the scope of coverage, which the court treated as a matter of fact rather than a legal question. Consequently, the court rejected the request for review, affirming that the lower court's factual findings on the contract's intent were binding.
Legislator headnote
OfficialSEGURO CONTRATO DE SEGURO INTERPRETAÇÃO DO NEGOCIO JURIDICO INTERPRETAÇÃO DA VONTADE MATERIA DE FACTO
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00000534
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ198806230018714
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[REFERENCIA DE PUBLICACAO] BMJ N378 ANO1988 PAG590
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/CD44099516AEFFFD802568FC0039337F?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
A interpretação, feita pela Relação, das clausulas dum contrato de seguro de responsabilidade civil emergente de acidente de trabalho e da vontade, expressa nessas clausulas pelas partes contraentes, constitui materia de facto que, não colidindo com o estipulado na apolice respectiva, o Supremo Tribunal de Justiça deve acatar.