Legislator Case Law & Legislation
087562 AI generated

Main intervention by contractor and advertiser inadmissible in construction defect action against seller.

Case Number 087562
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court declared the main intervention of the contractor and the advertising entity inadmissible in a lawsuit filed by a buyer against a seller for construction defects. The buyer sought damages based on discrepancies between the advertised property and the actual building, while the opposing parties argued for their right to participate in the proceedings. The court ruled that the primary liability rests with the seller, rendering the intervention of third parties unnecessary and procedurally improper.

Legislator headnote

Official

INTERVENÇÃO PRINCIPAL ADMISSIBILIDADE

Keywords

AI generated
main intervention inadmissibility construction defect liability seller buyer dispute contractor third party advertising conformity claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Código de Processo Civil, art. 344
Código de Processo Civil, art. 345

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00028042

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199506290875622

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 8974/94

[REFERENCIA DE PUBLICACAO] BMJ N448 ANO1995 PAG320

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/CC6D558B37CDAB06802568FC003ADA90?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Numa acção em que o comprador de uma andar formula pedido de condenação do vendedor por defeitos de construção e desconformidade com o que fora plublicitado, é inadmissível a intervenção principal, passiva, do empreiteiro e de quem fez a publicidade do empreendimento.