Main intervention by contractor and advertiser inadmissible in construction defect action against seller.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court declared the main intervention of the contractor and the advertising entity inadmissible in a lawsuit filed by a buyer against a seller for construction defects. The buyer sought damages based on discrepancies between the advertised property and the actual building, while the opposing parties argued for their right to participate in the proceedings. The court ruled that the primary liability rests with the seller, rendering the intervention of third parties unnecessary and procedurally improper.
Legislator headnote
OfficialINTERVENÇÃO PRINCIPAL ADMISSIBILIDADE
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00028042
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199506290875622
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 8974/94
[REFERENCIA DE PUBLICACAO] BMJ N448 ANO1995 PAG320
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/CC6D558B37CDAB06802568FC003ADA90?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
Numa acção em que o comprador de uma andar formula pedido de condenação do vendedor por defeitos de construção e desconformidade com o que fora plublicitado, é inadmissível a intervenção principal, passiva, do empreiteiro e de quem fez a publicidade do empreendimento.