Legislator Case Law & Legislation
99B013 AI generated

Portuguese Supreme Court rejects review of judicial presumptions, stating courts cannot assess their validity.

Case Number 99B013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice unanimously rejected the request to review a lower court's application of judicial presumptions. The appellant argued that the trial court erred in applying these presumptions without sufficient evidence, while the state contended that judicial presumptions are binding and only yield to direct contrary proof. The court ruled that it lacks jurisdiction to evaluate the correctness of judicial presumptions, which must be challenged only through direct contradictory evidence under Article 350 of the Civil Code.

Legislator headnote

Official

PRESUNÇÃO PRESUNÇÃO JURIS TANTUM PRESUNÇÃO JURIS ET DE JURE PODERES DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA

Keywords

AI generated
judicial presumption legal presumption appellate jurisdiction contrary proof civil code article 350 supreme court review binding precedent

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 350 n.º 2 do Código Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00036038

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199902110000132

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 385/97

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL COIMBRA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/CC3C4DB35E3FABA6802568FC003B9115?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - A presunção legal só cede perante prova em contrário, por força do n. 2 do artigo 350 do CCIV.

II - A presunção judicial pode ser afastada por meio de simples contraprova.

III - Se houve ou não erro por parte das instâncias ao usarem duma presunção judicial é vedado ao STJ apreciá-lo.

IV - Provada a prática duma contravenção pelo condutor de um veículo, presume-se o mesmo culpado por virtude da regra da experiência comum.