Plaintiff bears burden of proving defect existed before delivery in annulment action for defective sale.

The court ruled that the plaintiff must prove the existence of a defect prior to delivery in an action to annul a sales contract. The defendant argued against this burden allocation, but the court upheld the statutory requirement for the buyer to demonstrate the defect's pre-delivery existence. Consequently, the judgment established that the onus of proof rests squarely on the party claiming the contract is void due to latent defects.