Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
087714 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the court ruled on a different issue regarding the timing of easement requirements for priority rights.

Case Number 087714
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the appeal to the full bench, finding no valid grounds for the request. The appellant argued that the lower court incorrectly applied the law regarding priority rights based on legal easements of passage versus those acquired by prescription. The court determined that the lower court had not addressed the specific legal question concerning whether priority rights apply to prescriptive easements, instead deciding a distinct issue about the timing of easement constitution.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO PARA O TRIBUNAL PLENO SERVIDÃO DE PASSAGEM DIREITO DE PREFERÊNCIA

Keywords

AI generated
appeal to full bench legal easement of passage priority right applicability prescriptive easement procedural inadmissibility different legal issue Supreme Court of Justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1040 do Código Civil
Art. 1041 do Código Civil
Art. 1042 do Código Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00028484

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199510310877141

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/C8E45D062DB3F3C2802568FC003AEA88?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não se verificam os pressupostos do recurso para o tribunal pleno, se no acórdão recorrido se decretou que o direito de preferência com fundamento em servidão legal de passagem não se aplica às servidões constituidas por usucapião, e o acórdão fundamento se pronunciou sobre questão diferente, decidindo que a questão de saber se, para haver direito de preferência, a servidão já deve estar constituida ou basta que se verifiquem os pressupostos legais da sua constituição.