Portuguese Supreme Court rules prior criminal record and poverty do not automatically mitigate theft liability.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the appeal regarding the defendant's criminal record and economic situation. The prosecution argued that the defendant's lack of prior judicial history and modest financial status should mitigate the penalty for theft. The court rejected this, stating that a clean record does not guarantee good behavior and poverty only mitigates liability if it directly compelled the theft.
Legislator headnote
OfficialANTECEDENTES CRIMINAIS FURTO ATENUANTES PRESSUPOSTOS
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00026307
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ198301120367883
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/C4AD158CD2F66EC2802568FC003AD4E9?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
I - A falta de antecedentes judiciários não significa, só por si, bom comportamento anterior.
II - A modesta situação económica do réu só atenuaria a sua responsabilidade se tivessem sido dificuldades económicas que o levassem a querer apossar-se dos bens alheios.