Legislator Case Law & Legislation
97B472 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses omission of pronouncement; lower court must decide all submitted issues.

Case Number 97B472
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the appeal regarding the omission of a pronouncement on a procedural issue. The lower court had failed to address a question submitted by the parties, which the Supreme Court held could not be cured by its own intervention. Consequently, the case files were remitted to the Court of Appeal to resolve the matter.

Legislator headnote

Official

NULIDADE OMISSÃO DE PRONÚNCIA BAIXA DO PROCESSO AO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO PODERES DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA

Keywords

AI generated
omission of pronouncement procedural nullity remittal to lower court scope of jurisdiction supreme court powers civil procedure unanimous decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 229.º, n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00032303

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199707100004722

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 1100/95

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/C0A3ECE7019AF080802568FC003B5E05?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - O juiz deve conhecer de todas as questões que as partes tenham submetido à sua apreciação, exceptuadas aquelas cuja decisão esteja prejudicada pela solução dada a outras, e tal nulidade não pode ser suprida pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.

II - Assim, devem os autos baixar ao tribunal da Relação para que se pronuncie sobre a questão de que não conheceu, devendo conhecer dela.