Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
087786 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the Supreme Court did not decide on the specific date of breach of the sales promise contract.

Case Number 087786
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision regarding a contract for sale and purchase. The appellant argued that the lower court failed to determine whether the breach of contract occurred at the time of judicial notification or upon the execution of the deed with a third party. The court ruled that since the appealed judgment did not address the specific timing of the breach, the necessary prerequisites for filing an appeal to the Supreme Court were not met.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO PARA O TRIBUNAL PLENO CONTRATO-PROMESSA DE COMPRA E VENDA

Keywords

AI generated
contract for sale and purchase breach of contract timing appeal to Supreme Court procedural prerequisites judicial notification date

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 220, n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00028485

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199510310877861

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/BDAF620CAB565AC2802568FC003AEA9A?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não ocorrem os pressupostos do recurso para o tribunal pleno, se o acórdão recorrido foi chamado a decidir sobre quando ocorreu, por parte dos promitentes vendedores, o incumprimento definitivo do contrato (se na data da notificação judicial avulsa do promitente comprador, por eles requerida, comunicando-lhe a decisão de resolver o contrato-promessa que com ele haviam celebrado; se na data da realização da escritura de venda de todo o prédio a terceiro); e o acórdão fundamento não decidiu idêntica questão por tal lhe não ser pedido.