Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
087320 AI generated

Expropriation process dismissed as violation of Art. 38 CEXP91 is merely procedural irregularity without substantive impact.

Case Number 087320
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the appeal regarding an expropriation proceeding for public utility. The appellant argued that the defendant's failure to comply with Article 38 of the Expropriation Code constituted a procedural irregularity warranting substantive consequences. The court ruled that such non-compliance results only in a procedural defect without affecting the validity or progress of the expropriation itself.

Legislator headnote

Official

EXPROPRIAÇÃO POR UTILIDADE PÚBLICA COLIGAÇÃO PASSIVA IRREGULARIDADE PROCESSUAL OBJECTO DO PROCESSO

Keywords

AI generated
expropriation public utility procedural irregularity sanction expropriation code compliance passive irregularity processual discipline norm

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 38 of the Expropriation Code 1991

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00028037

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199506290873202

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 763/94

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL PORTO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/BAFD3916CD2BB1DF802568FC003ADA89?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A norma constante do artigo 38 do CEXP91 é uma mera norma de disciplina ou ordenamento do processo a acatar, em princípio, pelas entidades expropriantes, mas cujo desrespeito tem como sanção uma mera irregularidade, sem qualquer outra influência prática a nível da sua respectiva marcha.