Appeal dismissed as it cannot introduce new claims or cure prescription after the deadline expired.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the appeal because it sought to introduce a new claim and cure a prescription defect after the statutory deadline had passed. The appellant argued that the lower court's decision was flawed, but the opposing party contended that appeals are strictly for reviewing existing records, not creating new ones. The court ruled that since the appeal attempted to raise a matter outside the original scope and after the prescriptive period, it was inadmissible under civil procedure law.
Legislator headnote
OfficialRECURSO REFORMA DA DECISÃO PRESCRIÇÃO RENUNCIA QUESTÃO NOVA
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00008826
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199104110786292
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 1383/88
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/BADCE9CEE0075CD2802568FC0039CC77?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
I - A renuncia da prescrição so e admitida depois de haver decorrido o prazo prescricional - artigo 302 do Codigo Civil).
II - Os recursos são meios de obter a reforma das decisões dos Tribunais inferiores e não vias jurisdicionais para alcançar decisões novas - artigo 676, n. 1, 680, n. 1, e 690, do Codigo de Processo Civil.