Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
97B139 AI generated

Portuguese court holds that defendant's different value claim in special action does not constitute incidental verification of value.

Case Number 97B139
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the incidental verification of value raised by the defendant in a special action for consignation in deposit. Although the defendant contested the claim by indicating a different value, the court ruled this did not meet the legal requirements for an incidental verification of value. Consequently, the incidental was rejected, and the special action proceeded based on the original value indicated.

Legislator headnote

Official

CONSIGNAÇÃO EM DEPÓSITO INCIDENTES DA INSTÂNCIA VALOR

Keywords

AI generated
consignation in deposit special action incidental verification of value defendant's value claim procedural incident dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 240, n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 241 do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00031874

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199704300001392

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 600

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/BA787CB87D5402BA802568FC003B405D?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Na acção especial de consignação em depósito, a indicação de valor diferente pelo réu, na contestação, não consubstancia incidente de verificação de valor (incidente de instância).