Legislator Case Law & Legislation
041337 AI generated

Court applies heavier penalty to recidivist thief despite prior convictions for theft and fraud.

Case Number 041337
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice rejected the appeal arguing that the defendant, having been previously convicted for theft and fraud, required a heavier penalty to satisfy societal condemnation and prevent future crimes. The court held that prior convictions were insufficient to meet these goals, thus justifying a more severe sentence than those given to other thieves. Consequently, Articles 71 and 72 of the Penal Code were deemed inapplicable to mitigate the punishment in this specific recidivist scenario.

Legislator headnote

Official

FURTO SUSPENSÃO DA EXECUÇÃO DA PENA MEDIDA DA PENA

Keywords

AI generated
criminal recidivism heavier penalty application theft and fraud preventive justice penal code mitigation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 71 do Codigo Penal
Art. 72 do Codigo Penal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00007640

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199101300413373

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 14/90

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T J FUNCHAL

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/BA4EF0F00835F276802568FC0039B9AC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - E justificada a aplicação da pena mais grave ao recorrente do que aos outros reus do crime de furto, porque, sendo o unico dos arguidos que ja foi condenado, inclusive no dominio da receptação dolosa, a condenação anterior não foi bastante para satisfazer as necessidades de reprovação e prevenção do crime.

II - Pelas mesmas razões não são aplicaveis os artigos 71 e 72 do Codigo Penal.