Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
99B884 AI generated

Supreme Court denies precautionary measure when fear lacks concrete facts and license nullity is not patent.

Case Number 99B884
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice rejected the precautionary measure, ruling that the alleged fear must be based on concrete facts rather than hypothetical circumstances. The plaintiff argued for the nullity of a municipal building license due to alleged legal violations, while the defendant contended the defect was not patent. The court decided against the measure because the nullity was not obvious and the fear lacked factual foundation.

Legislator headnote

Official

PROCEDIMENTOS CAUTELARES PRESSUPOSTOS

Keywords

AI generated
precautionary measure founded fear requirement patent nullity standard incidental nullity concrete facts basis

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC 1995 Art. 381, n. 1
CPA 1991 Art. 134, n. 1, n. 2

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00040173

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ19991111008842

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 1347/98

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL COIMBRA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/AFC9BA3A6EEE2FA080256A680030C7CC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - O receio deve ser fundado em factos concretos, que não em circunstâncias de carácter meramente eventual, hipotético ou conjectural.

II - A nulidade do licenciamento camarário do prédio por supostos vícios de violação da lei só pode ser conhecida, a título incidental, por qualquer tribunal, se patente, ostensiva ou incontroversa.