Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
078831 AI generated

Appeal for review requires final judgment; procedural defect in agreement does not stop time bar.

Case Number 078831
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal for review because the underlying judgment had not yet become final. The appellant argued that a procedural error in the agreement rendered the judgment void, yet the court held that the statutory time limit for filing a review expired regardless of this defect. Consequently, the right to challenge the decision was lost due to the lapse of the prescribed period.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE REVISÃO CADUCIDADE PRESSUPOSTOS DECISÕES TRANSITADAS

Keywords

AI generated
appeal for review final judgment requirement caducidade do prazo erro no acordo transitada em julgado

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 543, n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 544 do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00010652

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199106190788312

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 1074/88

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL COIMBRA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/AEC2ACEDBCC67BC9802568FC0039E3F4?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - A interposição do recurso de revisão pressupõe sentença transitada.

II - O facto de o acordo, acolhido na sentença revidenda, ter sido declarado viciado por erro não afasta a caducidade do prazo para a revisão da mesma sentença.