Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
96B355 AI generated

Contract rescission for gambling monopoly requires asset return, excluding accumulated jackpot prizes.

Case Number 96B355
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the concessionaire's appeal regarding the return of assets after the State rescinded the gambling monopoly contract. The State argued that all assets, including accumulated jackpot prizes, must be returned, while the concessionaire contended that only tangible assets were required. The court ruled that the obligation to return assets does not extend to the monetary value of accumulated jackpot prizes.

Legislator headnote

Official

JOGO DE FORTUNA E AZAR RESCISÃO DE CONTRATO

Keywords

AI generated
gambling monopoly contract contract rescission asset return obligation accumulated jackpot prizes exclusive concession rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 104, n.º 1, alínea b) da Lei de Bases do Sistema de Jogos de Azar

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00030600

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199607040003552

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/868279F1AD35CAB0802568FC003B18F8?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Tendo sido rescindido pelo Estado um contrato de concessão do exclusivo de jogos de fortuna ou azar, deve a empresa concessionária, no prazo fixado, entregar ao mesmo Estado os bens afectos à concessão ou para ele reversíveis, não se incluindo neles a quantia correspondente aos prémios acumulados do "jackpot".