Portuguese Supreme Court voids judgment due to missing acta of reading defendant's first interrogation statements.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Justice annulled the second-instance judgment because the trial record failed to include the acta of reading the defendant's statements from the first judicial interrogation. The prosecution argued the omission was a clerical error, but the court held that the absence of this specific document violates mandatory procedural requirements. Consequently, the entire judgment was declared void to ensure the defendant's right to a fair trial was not compromised by the missing record.
Legislator headnote
OfficialNULIDADE DE ACÓRDÃO ANULAÇÃO DE JULGAMENTO ACTA DE JULGAMENTO LEITURA PERMITIDA DE AUTO
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00034413
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199712110010103
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 618/96
[REFERENCIA DE PUBLICACAO] BMJ N472 ANO1997 PAG402
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T J SANTAREM
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/7BC876837FD879C1802568FC003B76AE?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
Verifica-se a nulidade prevista no artigo 356 n. 8 do CPP, por força do disposto n. 2 do artigo 357 do mesmo diploma quando o tribunal não faz constar da acta de leitura das declarações prestadas pelo arguido perante o Juiz no primeiro interrogatório judicial, o que origina a nulidade do acórdão.