Legislator Case Law & Legislation
97P1010 AI generated

Portuguese Supreme Court voids judgment due to missing acta of reading defendant's first interrogation statements.

Case Number 97P1010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice annulled the second-instance judgment because the trial record failed to include the acta of reading the defendant's statements from the first judicial interrogation. The prosecution argued the omission was a clerical error, but the court held that the absence of this specific document violates mandatory procedural requirements. Consequently, the entire judgment was declared void to ensure the defendant's right to a fair trial was not compromised by the missing record.

Legislator headnote

Official

NULIDADE DE ACÓRDÃO ANULAÇÃO DE JULGAMENTO ACTA DE JULGAMENTO LEITURA PERMITIDA DE AUTO

Keywords

AI generated
nullity of judgment acta of reading first judicial interrogation procedural defect Portuguese Criminal Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 356 n. 8 CPP
Art. 357 n. 2 CPP

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00034413

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199712110010103

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 618/96

[REFERENCIA DE PUBLICACAO] BMJ N472 ANO1997 PAG402

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T J SANTAREM

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/7BC876837FD879C1802568FC003B76AE?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Verifica-se a nulidade prevista no artigo 356 n. 8 do CPP, por força do disposto n. 2 do artigo 357 do mesmo diploma quando o tribunal não faz constar da acta de leitura das declarações prestadas pelo arguido perante o Juiz no primeiro interrogatório judicial, o que origina a nulidade do acórdão.