Legislator Case Law & Legislation
97B266 AI generated

Divorce action dismissed due to lapse of right; repeated infidelity constitutes respect violation justifying divorce.

Case Number 97B266
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal regarding the lapse of the right to divorce, ruling that the limitation period only begins when the factual situation ceases. The original divorce request was based on the repeated attribution of lovers to the other spouse, which the court recognized as a violation of the duty of respect capable of compromising cohabitation. Consequently, the appeal failed because the underlying facts supporting the divorce claim remained valid and the right had not expired.

Legislator headnote

Official

DIVÓRCIO LITIGIOSO CADUCIDADE DA ACÇÃO VIOLAÇÃO DEVER DE RESPEITO

Keywords

AI generated
divorce action lapse duty of respect violation repeated infidelity grounds cohabitation compromise limitation period start

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 240, n.º 1 do Código Civil
Art. 1638 do Código Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00033404

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199710090002662

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 321/96

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL PORTO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/7B3CD567712C2FDE802568FC003BA05D?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Tratando-se de facto continuado, a caducidade do direito ao divórcio só corre a partir da data em que o facto tiver cessado.

II - Constitui violação do dever de respeito, susceptível de comprometer a possibilidade da vida em comum, e, assim, de justificar o pedido de divórcio, a atribuição reiterada de amantes ao outro cônjuge.