Portuguese Supreme Court rules that divergent factual findings between lower courts constitute material fact, not law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the appeal regarding the classification of divergent factual findings from lower courts. The appellant argued these inconsistencies were legal errors, but the court held they represented material facts due to their direct link to proven evidence. Consequently, the court ruled that such divergences fall under the jurisdiction of the trial judge on facts rather than the appellate court on law.
Legislator headnote
OfficialMATERIA DE FACTO JUIZO DE VALOR MATERIA DE DIREITO
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00013254
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199112050811002
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 24918
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL PORTO
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/7773E2D3DB09DBF6802568FC0039FEA3?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
As divergentes decisões das instancias resultantes de divergentes entendimentos dos factos provados, traduzindo-se em juizos de facto, ou seja, juizos de valor sobre e em intima ou predominante ligação com a materia de facto provada, constituem ainda materia de facto.