Legislator Case Law & Legislation
088088 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review of unproven facts regarding a party's liability as it lacks jurisdiction.

Case Number 088088
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice rejected the review request because the underlying facts were entirely unproven in lower instances. The appellant argued for liability changes based on these unsubstantiated claims, but the court determined the matter fell outside its jurisdiction. Consequently, the court ruled that assertions built solely on unproven facts are irrelevant for altering the established liability.

Legislator headnote

Official

MATÉRIA DE FACTO COMPETÊNCIA DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional_exclusion unproven_facts liability_determination supreme_court_review procedural_relevance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 223.º do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 224.º do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00031145

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199610220880881

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 888/94

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL PORTO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/6F5CEAFABED3354A802568FC003B320B?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A asserção construída completamente sobre factos não provados nas instâncias é irrelevante para o efeito de alterar o decidido quanto à responsabilidade da recorrente, por se tratar de matéria excluída da competência do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.