Legislator Case Law & Legislation
087158 AI generated

Court finds opposition exists when identical laws are interpreted restrictively versus freely regarding merchant document searches.

Case Number 087158
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice unanimously determined that an opposition between two prior rulings exists due to divergent interpretations of the same legal norms. One decision restricts the examination of merchant books to cases involving the merchant's interest or responsibility, while the other permits free examination regardless of such conditions. The court concluded that this interpretative conflict satisfies the legal requirements for declaring an opposition between the two acórdãos.

Legislator headnote

Official

OPOSIÇÃO DE ACÓRDÃOS EXAME À ESCRITA

Keywords

AI generated
opposition between judgments divergent legal interpretation merchant document search restrictive vs free examination same statutory norms

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 240, n.º 1, do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 241, do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00027463

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199505160871581

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/6AE15CC2550C694C802568FC003ADFF2?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Existe oposição de acórdãos se ambas as decisões se apoiam nas mesmas normas, mas interpretadas de modos diversos, de tal forma que uma delas faz interpretação restritiva ao passo que a outra admite que se possa ordenar livremente exame nos livros e documentos do comerciante, independentemente de ele ter interesse ou responsabilidade na questão em litígio.