Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
047757 AI generated

Portuguese Supreme Court dismisses appeal for irregular suspension of drug trafficking judgment due to conditional amnesty. The court orders notification to the accused to satisfy the amnesty condition within the set timeframe.

Case Number 047757
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the appeal because the lower court failed to suspend the drug trafficking judgment while the conditional amnesty condition was pending. The defendant argued for suspension, but the court ruled that the lower tribunal's failure to do so was a procedural irregularity that must be raised at the time of judgment. Consequently, the court ordered the accused to be personally notified to demonstrate satisfaction of the amnesty condition within the prescribed period.

Legislator headnote

Official

TRÁFICO DE ESTUPEFACIENTE AMNISTIA CONDIÇÃO SUSPENSIVA IRREGULARIDADE PROCESSUAL

Keywords

AI generated
conditional amnesty suspension of trial drug trafficking offense procedural irregularity notification of accused Supreme Court of Justice Código de Processo Penal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 110.º do Código de Processo Penal
Art. 2.º da Lei de Amnistia de 1994

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00025052

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199504060477573

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 48/94

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T CIRC BEJA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/606EFF9D79F8DEFF802568FC003AB9DD?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Nos casos em que a amnistia é concedida sob condição suspensiva da prévia reparação ao lesado, em certo prazo, o tribunal deve sobrestar ao julgamento, até se mostrar satisfeita a condição ou ter decorrido esse prazo.

II - Se assim não tiver procedido e tiver concluido o julgamento, foi cometida uma irregularidade que devia ser arguida no próprio acto.

III - Se o processo subir em recurso, o Supremo deve ordenar a notificação pessoal do arguido para mostrar que satisfez essa condição; expirado o prazo, se o arguido nada disser, a irregularidade fica sanada.