Legislator Case Law & Legislation
97A529 AI generated

Portuguese court allows attaching non-evidentiary documents to facilitate judicial interpretation of Brussels Convention.

Case Number 97A529
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court permitted the attachment of a document solely intended to aid judicial interpretation rather than prove substantive rights. The parties argued whether such non-evidentiary materials could be joined during the preliminary phase of proceedings. The decision established that documents facilitating the interpretation of the Brussels Convention fall within the broad concept of legal opinions.

Legislator headnote

Official

JUNÇÃO DE DOCUMENTO PRAZO PARECERES

Keywords

AI generated
procedural admissibility Brussels Convention legal opinion judicial interpretation document attachment preliminary phase civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 250, n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 10 da Convenção de Bruxelas de 10 de Maio de 1952

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00033377

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199710140005291

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 853/96

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/5BA8AD7A2DCAD6DA802568FC003BA11F?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

É admissível, até se iniciarem os vistos aos juízes, a junção de documento que não visa provar quaisquer factos constitutivos de direitos das partes mas apenas facilitar a tarefa do Tribunal, auxiliando-o na interpretação dos vários preceitos da Convenção de Bruxelas, de 10 de Maio de 1952, cabendo assim no conceito amplo de parecer de jurisconsulto.