Court holds that authorship summons only triggers res judicata effect, not immediate obligation fulfillment.

The court unanimously rejected the request to review the authorship summons, ruling that it does not impose immediate obligations on the defendant. The procedural outcome was a denial of the review, as the summons merely triggers the effect of res judicata from the future judgment. The court reasoned that the summons serves to establish the binding nature of the eventual decision rather than enforcing any specific duty at this stage.