Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
002745 AI generated

Court holds no omission of ruling exists when determining jurisdiction between labor and civil courts.

Case Number 002745
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the incident regarding the alleged omission of a ruling. The parties argued that the court failed to explicitly name the competent tribunal after declaring the labor court incompetent. The court ruled that by identifying the common civil court as competent, the omission was legally non-existent.

Legislator headnote

Official

COMPETENCIA MATERIAL NULIDADE DE ACORDÃO OMISSÃO DE PRONUNCIA TRIBUNAL DO TRABALHO TRIBUNAL COMUM

Keywords

AI generated
omission of ruling jurisdiction determination labor court incompetence civil court competence procedural incident dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 240 do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 241 do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 242 do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00006182

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199101090027454

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 6309/90

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/54DB9F212DF0139C802568FC00399F9D?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não ha omissão de pronuncia quando o Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, ao decidir qual e o tribunal competente em razão da materia, considera incompetente o tribunal do trabalho e competente o tribunal comum civil, sem, no entanto, precisar qual o tribunal competente.