Court holds direct interest in opposing a request is required for standing under Article 26 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the appeal regarding the legitimacy of a party to oppose a specific request. The appellant argued for standing based on a general interest, while the opposing party contended that only a direct interest in the outcome was sufficient. The court ruled that legitimacy requires a direct interest in contradicting the request because the request's approval would cause corresponding prejudice to the party.
Legislator headnote
OfficialLEGITIMIDADE
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00027687
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199510260873532
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 801/94
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL COIMBRA
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/4B6FAB70E282F008802568FC003ADEF5?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
É parte legítima quem manifeste interesse directo em contradizer o pedido, pois que da procedência deste lhe advem o prejuízo correspondente à condenação (artigo 26 do Código do Processo Civil).