Driver acting for another is liable for damages unless their own lack of fault is proven.

The court dismissed the review regarding civil liability for a traffic accident, affirming that a driver acting for another bears responsibility unless their own fault is proven. The plaintiff argued for liability based on the driver's role, while the defense contended the presumption of fault was not absolute. The court ruled that Article 503, Section 3 of the Civil Code establishes a rebuttable 'juris tantum' presumption of fault, requiring the driver to prove their own lack of negligence to avoid liability.