Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
98A1224 AI generated

Court holds execution objections inadmissible before 1995 reform as Article 486(2) Civil Code was inapplicable.

Case Number 98A1224
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice rejected the execution objections filed by the debtor, ruling them inadmissible due to a specific procedural timeline. Before the 1995 Civil Code reform, Article 486(2) did not apply to execution objections, a rule now codified in Article 816(3). Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal because the legal basis for the objections was inapplicable at the time of filing.

Legislator headnote

Official

EMBARGOS DE EXECUTADO PETIÇÃO INICIAL REJEIÇÃO PRAZO CONTESTAÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
execution objections Civil Code reform procedural inapplicability execution appeal debtor rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 486(2) C.P. Civil
Art. 816(3) C.P. Civil
DL 329-A/95
Antes da reforma processual introduzida pelo DL 329-A/95, de 12 de Dezembro, já se devia entender como inaplicável

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00035391

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199901200012241

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 1627/96

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/429804EB6362D397802568FC003B883C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Antes da reforma processual introduzida pelo DL 329-A/95, de 12 de Dezembro, já se devia entender como inaplicável

à dedução de embargos de executado o disposto no n. 2, do artigo 486, do C.P. Civil, solução hoje expressamente consagrada no n. 3, do artigo 816, daquele mesmo código.