Legislator Case Law & Legislation
081354 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the appeal value is below half the Supreme Court's jurisdictional limit.

Case Number 081354
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice declined to hear the appeal filed by the defendants against the lower court's judgment. The procedural barrier arose because the appeal value, calculated based on the original 1986 claim amounts, fell below the statutory threshold of half the court's jurisdictional limit. Consequently, the appeal was inadmissible, and the first-instance decision confirming the plaintiff's claim remained in force.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE ACORDÃO DA RELAÇÃO ADMISSIBILIDADE ALÇADA SUCUMBENCIA ARRENDAMENTO RURAL DESPEJO

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional limit appeal value inadmissible appeal Supreme Court procedural threshold

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 240, n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 241 do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00015183

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199204090813542

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 3976

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/412AFF4BC2CFDC83802568FC003A05BC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Tendo os autores atribuido a acção o valor de 2500 escudos em 1986 e os reus a reconvenção o de 1298400 escudos no mesmo ano, valores esses que não foram alterados, não e admissivel revista dos reus para o Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, limitada a parte do acordão da Relação que confirma a decisão da 1 Instancia que julga procedente a acção, posto que o valor da sucumbencia e inferior a metade da alçada desse tribunal.