Legislator Case Law & Legislation
01B614 AI generated

Third-party possession protection via summary proceedings overrides property rights when factual control is established.

Case Number 01B614
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court granted the third-party possession action, ruling that the law protects factual control rather than abstract property titles. The plaintiff, a third party, successfully claimed possession against the defendant based on immediate factual control, while the defendant argued for their underlying property right. The court decided in favor of the plaintiff because possession is a provisional remedy justified only until the true owner is proven.

Legislator headnote

Official

EMBARGOS DE TERCEIRO REIVINDICAÇÃO TUTELA POSSESSÓRIA

Keywords

AI generated
third-party possession summary proceedings factual control property rights provisional remedy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CCIV66 Art. 1251
CCIV66 Art. 1278

Cited Case Law

AI generated
STJ Decision 1991/06/26 in BMJ N608

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00041269

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ200104260006142

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 1346/00

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL PORTO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/40C6A319D548E4B080256B30005206EE?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I- É só o poder de facto que é a posse que a Lei protege, mediante os embargos de terceiro, e não o direito de propriedade de qualquer outro direito real.

II- A tutela da posse tem uma natureza provisória, que só se justifica enquanto não se provar quem é o titular do direito correspondente.

III- Tendo improcedido a acção de reivindicação que o terceiro embargante intentara, improcedem os embargos de terceiro.