Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
002690 AI generated

Third party execution denied when creditor fails to prove debtor owns the encumbered assets.

Case Number 002690
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the execution action against a third party who was not the actual owner of the encumbered assets. Although the plaintiff held a privileged claim under Article 25 of the Individual Employment Contract Legal Regime, they failed to demonstrate that the assets had been transferred to the defendant and that the defendant possessed them in their own name. Consequently, the court ruled that the third party was not a legitimate defendant because the essential link of ownership was unproven.

Legislator headnote

Official

EXECUÇÃO ACÇÃO EXECUTIVA LEGITIMIDADE PASSIVA TERCEIRO

Keywords

AI generated
execution action legitimacy third party defendant privileged creditor claim asset ownership proof individual employment contract

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 25 of the Legal Regime of the Individual Employment Contract

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00007503

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199101160026904

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 5319/89

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/3F4261077697ABCD802568FC0039B74D?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

E parte ilegitima um terceiro, executado, desde que o exequente, embora credor privilegiado nos termos do artigo 25 do Regime Juridico do Contrato Individual de Trabalho, não demonstre que os bens onerados tenham sido transmitidos para o executado e este os possua em nome proprio.