Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
000435 AI generated

Labor appeal dismissed for desertion due to failure to include substantive allegations in the request. The court ruled that the request for an appeal must contain the appellant's arguments. Consequently, the appeal was declared deserted because the required allegations were absent. The decision enforces strict procedural compliance under the new Labor Process Code. This case establishes that omitting arguments in an appeal request leads to automatic desertion. The ruling clarifies the mandatory nature of including allegations in such procedural documents. Adherence to these formal requirements is essential for the validity of labor appeals. The court emphasized the importance of clear and complete procedural submissions. Failure to meet these standards results in the dismissal of the appeal.

Case Number 000435
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice declared the labor appeal deserted due to the absence of substantive allegations in the request for the appeal. The appellant argued that the procedural defect should not invalidate their claim, while the opposing party contended that the new Labor Process Code strictly requires allegations in the request. The court ruled that the request for an appeal must always contain the appellant's arguments, and its omission constitutes desertion under Article 76 of the new Labor Process Code.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE AGRAVO INTERPOSIÇÃO DE RECURSO ALEGAÇÕES ESCRITAS PROCESSO DE TRABALHO DESERÇÃO DE RECURSO

Keywords

AI generated
labor appeal desertion procedural allegations requirement new labor process code supreme court of justice appeal request formalities

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 76 n. 1 do novo Código do Processo de Trabalho

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00026489

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ198302040004354

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/3EAEB3BC92881AFB802568FC003AC6DC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - No recurso de agravo interposto da 2. instância para o Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, o requerimento de interposição de recurso deve conter a respectiva alegação, aplicando-se-lhe o disposto no n. 1 do artigo 76 do novo Código do Processo de Trabalho.

II - Isto é, o requerimento de interposição do recurso de agravo, quer na primeira, quer na segunda instância, deverá sempre conter a alegação do recorrente.

III - A consequência da falta de alegações com o requerimento de interposição do recurso é a sua deserção.