Non-pharmacist landlord denied priority right in pharmacy lease transfer due to lack of statutory qualification.

The court dismissed the landlord's claim for priority rights in the transfer of a pharmacy lease. The landlord, who was not a pharmacist, argued for preferential treatment under general lease transfer laws, while the tenant and opposing parties contended that such rights are restricted to licensed professionals. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for a pharmacist's license is a mandatory condition for exercising priority rights, thereby excluding the non-licensed landlord from the benefit.