Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
00A3069 AI generated

STJ denies appeal to re-examine expropriation compensation fixed by a non-appealable Regional Court judgment.

Case Number 00A3069
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice rejected the appeal challenging the compensation amount for public utility expropriation previously set by a Regional Court. The appellant argued that the Regional Court's interpretation of the compensation criteria required re-evaluation by the Supreme Court. However, the court ruled that such compensation determinations are final and cannot be re-discussed through this procedural avenue.

Legislator headnote

Official

EXPROPRIAÇÃO POR UTILIDADE PÚBLICA INDEMNIZAÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
expropriation compensation public utility finality of judgment Supreme Court jurisdiction procedural admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Código de Processo Civil, artigo 900
Código de Expropriação, artigo 64, n.º 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00040937

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ200102080039691

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 3930/00

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/33BB31F370DBD5CD80256ADA003CFE47?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não é admissível, à sombra de recurso sobre a interpretação do acórdão da Relação que fixou a indemnização devida por expropriação - irrecorrível para o STJ, rediscutir esta questão.