Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
96A139 AI generated

Court holds that answering questions requires only precise proof identification and justification of the judge's choice.

Case Number 96A139
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court unanimously ruled that the judge's responses to evidentiary questions were sufficient without further elaboration. The parties argued regarding the depth of required justification for the selected evidence. The court decided that precise identification of proof and the stated reasons for the choice constitute adequate fundamental reasoning.

Legislator headnote

Official

RESPOSTAS AOS QUESITOS FUNDAMENTAÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
fundamental reasoning standard evidentiary questions judicial choice justification proof identification requirement civil procedure fundamentals

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 269, n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00029741

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199604300001391

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 8003/93

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/2D780C877C37672B802568FC003B01AC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A fundamentação das respostas aos quesitos basta-se com a identificação precisa dos meios de prova concretos e a menção das razões justificativas da opção feita pelo julgador.