Legislator Case Law & Legislation
044685 AI generated

Portuguese Supreme Court rules oral testimony must be examined in court without public reading.

Case Number 044685
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice unanimously rejected the appeal regarding the admissibility of documentary evidence. The court held that all non-written testimonies must be examined orally during the judgment hearing rather than read publicly. Consequently, the request to read documents was denied as it contradicts the mandatory oral examination of evidence in the Portuguese penal procedure.

Legislator headnote

Official

PROVAS APRECIAÇÃO DA PROVA PROVA DOCUMENTAL PROVA TESTEMUNHAL AUDIÊNCIA DE JULGAMENTO

Keywords

AI generated
oral examination of evidence public reading of documents penal procedure system testimony reduction to writing judgment hearing requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 320.º do Código de Processo Penal
Art. 321.º do Código de Processo Penal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00020891

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199309150446853

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 1514/92

[REFERENCIA DE PUBLICACAO] BMJ N429 ANO1993 PAG736

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T J ALMADA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/2D5AC6ADFC78FF13802568FC003A94CD?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - O nosso sistema processual penal determina a incorporação no processo, ou a apensação, de todos os meios de prova que tenham interesse para a sua solução.

II - Todas as provas, não correspondentes à redução a escrito de depoimentos ou declarações de intervenientes no processo, são "examinadas" no julgamento sem haver lugar à sua leitura pública.