Gross procedural error in filing a recourse does not constitute inadmissible litigation under Article 456 of the Civil Procedure Code.

The court unanimously decided to alter the previous ruling, allowing the recourse despite a gross error in its procedural filing. The appellant argued that the mistake rendered the recourse inadmissible under Article 456 of the Civil Procedure Code, while the opposing party contended that such errors should be strictly penalized. The court held that a gross error regarding the use of procedural means does not meet the specific requirements of Article 456 to declare a recourse inadmissible.