Legislator Case Law & Legislation
043167 AI generated

Portuguese Supreme Court rejects appeal for not specifying proof error conclusions under Art. 412(1) CPP.

Case Number 043167
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Justice rejected the criminal appeal because the appellant failed to specify the conclusions regarding the alleged notoriouss error in evidence appraisal. The appellant merely claimed an error without detailing the specific facts or legal conclusions required by Article 412(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Consequently, the court determined the appeal was procedurally defective and dismissed it without examining the merits of the underlying case.

Legislator headnote

Official

MOTIVAÇÃO ERRO NOTÓRIO NA APRECIAÇÃO DA PROVA REJEIÇÃO DE RECURSO

Keywords

AI generated
Criminal Procedure Code Notoriouss Error Evidence Appraisal Procedural Defect Appeal Rejection Specific Conclusions Portuguese Law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 412, n. 1 do Código de Processo Penal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00016477

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199209230431673

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 42/90

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T CR LISBOA 4J

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/286C3E3A522166AF802568FC003A3EB3?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - A motivação é a força processual onde o recorrente demonstra a sem razão da sentença e as normas jurídicas violadas.

II - Declarando apenas o recorrente que existe erro notório na apreciação da prova, sem concretizar e sem indicar conclusões, fica sem se saber quais as pretensões que o recorrente pretende alcançar (artigo 412, n. 1, do Código de Processo Penal), pelo que o recurso deve ser rejeitado.