Legislator Case Law & Legislation
087458 AI generated

Third-party seizure of property via third-party seizure is dismissed when it does not infringe a third party's possession rights.

Case Number 087458
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the third-party seizure action filed by a lessee against a third party. The lessee argued that the seizure violated their possession rights, but the court found no infringement occurred. Consequently, the request for restitution of possession was rejected as the legal conditions for such relief were not met.

Legislator headnote

Official

EMBARGOS DE TERCEIRO ARROLAMENTO

Keywords

AI generated
third party seizure possession rights embargos de terceiro property restitution civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Código Civil Português, artigos 1330 e 1331

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00028045

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199507040874582

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 6169

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/241A688F3C2943AC802568FC003ADA97?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Quando o arrolamento ofenda a posse de terceiro, pode o lesado fazer-se restituir à sua posse por meio de embargos.