Third-party seizure of property via third-party seizure is dismissed when it does not infringe a third party's possession rights.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the third-party seizure action filed by a lessee against a third party. The lessee argued that the seizure violated their possession rights, but the court found no infringement occurred. Consequently, the request for restitution of possession was rejected as the legal conditions for such relief were not met.
Legislator headnote
OfficialEMBARGOS DE TERCEIRO ARROLAMENTO
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTJ00028045
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SJ199507040874582
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 6169
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T REL LISBOA
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/241A688F3C2943AC802568FC003ADA97?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
Quando o arrolamento ofenda a posse de terceiro, pode o lesado fazer-se restituir à sua posse por meio de embargos.