Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
01023/08 AI generated

Portuguese court dismisses review appeal regarding factual findings on damages and interest balancing under administrative law.

Case Number 01023/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the review appeal because the lower court's judgment on damages and interest balancing constituted a factual matter outside the scope of review. The appellant argued for a re-evaluation of these specific factual determinations, but the court held that such assessments are excluded from appellate scrutiny under the relevant administrative procedure code. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as the reviewed decision relied on facts that the Supreme Administrative Tribunal cannot re-examine.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE REVISTA PRESSUPOSTOS PROVIDÊNCIA CAUTELAR

Keywords

AI generated
administrative review appeal factual findings exclusion damages assessment scope interests balancing review Supreme Administrative Tribunal procedural admissibility appellate jurisdiction limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 150(4) no. 2 of the Administrative Procedure Code
Art. 120(2) of the Administrative Procedure Code
artigo 150.º do CPTA

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA0009789

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA12008112701023

[RECORRENTE] MADRP

[RECORRIDO 1] A... E OUTROS

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/F8D0FC2197CFD2CD8025751D0038FF33?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Constitui matéria de facto subtraída do âmbito do recurso de revista fora das situações tipificadas na 2ª parte, do n.º 4, do artigo 150.º do CPTA, o juízo feito pelas instâncias quanto à existência de prejuízos e quanto à ponderação de interesses prevista no n.º 2, do art.º 120.º do citado Diploma Legal, não sendo, assim, de admitir a revista, por virtude de o Acórdão recorrido se ter apoiado em juízos de facto que não podem ser revistos pelo STA, destarte não podendo equacionar uma diferente apreciação no que se reporta às vertentes antes referenciadas.