Supreme Administrative Court dismisses exceptional review appeal as decision was legally plausible and relevant only to the specific case.

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously dismissed the exceptional review appeal filed by the asylum seeker against the Service of Foreigners and Borders. The applicant argued that the initial decision regarding international protection was flawed, but the court found the original ruling legally sound and factually grounded. Consequently, the court held that the appeal lacked merit because the decision was already justified and its relevance was confined to the specific circumstances of the case.