Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
01085/12 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses exceptional appeal on taxi license expiry due to lack of service availability and parking space.

Case Number 01085/12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously dismissed the exceptional appeal filed by A..., LDA against the Municipality of Arronches. The court found that the legal regime regarding the expiration of a taxi license due to unavailability for service and lack of parking is clear and does not require exceptional review. Consequently, the court held that the facts found in the proceedings fit the statutory norms without raising relevant doubts or issues beyond the case itself. Therefore, the appeal was rejected as it lacked the necessary justification for admission under the law.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE REVISTA EXCEPCIONAL PRESSUPOSTOS

Keywords

AI generated
taxi license expiration service unavailability parking space absence exceptional appeal DL 41/2003 administrative review lack of justification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17.º of DL 41/2003
Art. 18.º of DL 41/2003

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P14776

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA12012103101085

[RECORRENTE] A..., LDA

[RECORRIDO 1] MUNICÍPIO DE ARRONCHES

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/F597C89D6AF6228780257AB1003C22EB?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O regime legal da caducidade de licença de táxi por indisponibilidade para o serviço e ausência do local de estacionamento estipulado, tal como decorre dos art.ºs 17.º e 18.º do DL 41/2003 de 11.03 não suscita dúvidas que determinem linhas interpretativas dissonantes sobre o sentido e alcance das normas e, por outro lado, a subsunção dos factos apurados no processo nas referidas normas não suscita dúvidas relevantes e muito menos capazes de repercussão extra processo, pelo que não se justifica admitir recurso excepcional, ainda que o recorrente alegue também inconstitucionalidade daquelas normas.