Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
001534 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses appeal, ruling the jury must strictly consider all legally required preference documents in public competition merit reviews.

Case Number 001534
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously dismissed the appeal filed by Joaquim Martins against the jury's decision in a public competition for pilot officers. The respondent argued that the jury exercised its discretionary power to exclude certain candidates despite their documented qualifications and moral standing. The court held that while the jury possesses discretion in evaluating merit, it is bound by law to consider all documentary proof of preferences mandated by the statute, making such exclusions without proper documentation legally invalid.

Legislator headnote

Official

EXTINÇÃO DA INSTANCIA CONCURSO ACTO COMPLEXO CABO-PILOTO CORPORAÇÃO DOS PILOTOS DO RIO E BARRA DE LISBOA CONDIÇÕES DE PREFERENCIA APTIDÃO BOM COMPORTAMENTO MORAL E CIVIL ANTIGUIDADE HABILITAÇÕES LITERARIAS REQUISITOS DE ADMISSÃO LISTA DE GRADUAÇÃO PROVA DOCUMENTAL PROVA LEGAL FORMALIDADE ESSENCIAL ANULAÇÃO PODERES DO JURI PODER DISCRICIONARIO PODER VINCULADO ACTO PRE-DECISORIO

Keywords

AI generated
public competition merit review jury discretionary power limits documentary proof of preferences administrative binding obligation pre-decision act validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
D. 41668 de 1958/06/07 Art. 13
D. 41668 de 1958/06/07 Art. 19
D. 41668 de 1958/06/07 Art. 20
D. 41668 de 1958/06/07 Art. 21
D. 41668 de 1958/06/07 Art. 130
CPC 61 Art. 201 n.º 2
CPC 61 Art. 276 n.º 3
CPC 61 Art. 287 e

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER - FUNÇÃO PUBL ESTATUTARIO.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] D 41668 DE 1958/06/07 ART13 ART19 ART20 ART21 ART130. CPC61 ART201 N2 ART276 N3 ART287 E.

[1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 46

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 0

[APENDICE] DG

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 10/29/1965

[DATA DO APENDICE] 10/21/1969

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00000836

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SAP19670601001534

[OBJECTO] AC 1 SECÇÃO PROC6559 PROC6595.

[PAGINA] 0

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] MARTINS , JOAQUIM

[RECORRIDO 1] MARTINS , JOSE E OUTRO

[REFERENCIA A DOUTRINA] MARCELLO CAETANO MANUAL PAG249 PAG261. PAUL DUEZ E GUY DEBEYRE TRAITE DE DROIT ADMINISTRATIF PAG186 PAG386.

[REFERENCIA A PARECERES] P PGR IN BMJ N162 PAG147.

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/F46F3AB7B271DDB5802568FC00380697?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não obstante o seu poder discricionario na apreciação do merito dos candidatos a concurso, tem o juri vinculadamente de considerar todos os documentos comprovativos das preferencias exigidas ou permitidas pela Lei e so esses.*