Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
01992/16.3BEPRT AI generated

Administrative court dismisses appeal against monetary penalty fixing due to repealed law and irrelevant prior precedent.

Case Number 01992/16.3BEPRT
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the appeal filed by the Hospital Center against a monetary penalty imposed on it. The hospital argued that the penalty was based on a repealed legal provision and relied on a prior, final judgment to challenge the amount. The court rejected these arguments, noting that the cited law was already abolished and the hospital's main criticisms targeted a past decision rather than the current legal basis.

Legislator headnote

Official

APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR SANÇÃO PECUNIÁRIA

Keywords

AI generated
monetary sanction repealed statute final judgment administrative appeal procedural bar legal validity contractual penalty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 283-A do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P25029

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA12019101401992/16

[RECORRENTE] CENTRO HOSPITALAR DE LEIRIA, EPE

[RECORRIDO 1] A... SA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/F3B9727F160939198025849B0055C2FF?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não é de admitir a revista do acórdão confirmativo de uma sentença que fixou o «quantum» da sanção pecuniária que o Centro Hospitalar promotor de um procedimento pré-contratual devia pagar à concorrente autora – que obteve «in judicio» a anulação do acto de adjudicação a outrem, embora fosse então afastado o efeito anulatório do contrato – porque as censuras que aquele Centro enuncia na sua minuta deste recurso têm sobretudo por alvo um aresto anterior, já transitado, e porque as «quaestiones juris» em presença respeitam a uma norma – o art. 283°-A do CCP – já entretanto revogada.