Portuguese court dismisses appeal where omission of pronouncement is claimed but substantive issues remain unresolved.

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appellant's claim alleging an omission of pronouncement. The appellant argued that the lower court failed to address specific legal questions, while the respondent maintained that all necessary issues were resolved. The court ruled that an omission of pronouncement only exists if the questions that should have been decided were not actually resolved, distinguishing between the act of omission and the existence of unresolved matters.