Service convenience cannot override disciplinary infractions; contract rescission based on convenience is void if facts prove disciplinary breach.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court annulled the Ministry's rescission of the contract, which was originally justified by service convenience. The appellant argued that the dismissal was improper, while the respondent maintained the convenience grounds were valid. The court ruled that when facts constitute a disciplinary infraction, the convenience argument is legally invalid and the rescission must be based on the infraction.
Legislator headnote
OfficialRESCISÃO DE CONTRATO CONVENIENCIA DE SERVIÇO INFRACÇÃO DISCIPLINAR
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER - FUNÇÃO PUBL DISCIPLINAR.
[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 37268 DE 1948/12/31 ART82 PAR2.
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA DE 1942/07/17 IN COL AC PAG495. AC STA DE 1944/02/11 IN COL AC PAG86. AC STA DE 1948/03/19 IN COL AC PAG202. AC STA DE 1949/04/01 IN COL AC PAG167.
[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 1958
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00026423
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119560518004692
[Nº DO VOLUME] XXII
[OBJECTO] DESP MINCPS DE 1955/09/07.
[PAGINA] 41
[PRIVACIDADE] 01
[RECORRENTE] VENTURA , JOÃO
[RECORRIDO 1] MINCPS
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/F0CF7F346F421CF6802568FC0037C9B8?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
A conveniencia de serviço e o motivo disciplinar constituem causas diferentes de rescisão dos contratos, sendo de anular o despacho que, invocando a conveniencia de serviço, decretou a rescisão quando se prove que esta teve por fundamento factos qualificados como infracção disciplinar.