Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
009241 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses challenge to arbitration tribunal's use of public force against judicial misconduct.

Case Number 009241
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed Antonio Champalimaud's appeal against a ministerial order prohibiting the voluntary arbitration tribunal from functioning. Champalimaud argued that the tribunal's invocation of public force to address misconduct in a judicial audience violated the prestige of the judiciary. The court ruled that since a judicial arbitrator exercises jurisdiction equal to a judge under the Civil Procedure Code, they are authorized to use public force to prevent or repress misconduct by parties, as permitted by the relevant articles.

Legislator headnote

Official

TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL TRIBUNAIS JUDICIAIS FUNCIONAMENTO NORMAL DO SERVIÇO PRESIDENTE DO TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL REQUISIÇÃO DE FORÇA PUBLICA ERRO NOS PRESSUPOSTOS DE DIREITO

Keywords

AI generated
arbitration tribunal public force judicial misconduct civil procedure code arbitrator jurisdiction administrative appeal procedural violation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Articles 1516 and 1517 of the Civil Procedure Code
Article 154, paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Code
Paragraph 1 of Article 93 of the Criminal Procedure Code
Articles 71 and 116 of the Constitution
Articles 301 of the Penal Code
Articles 93 and 1516 of the Civil Procedure Code

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Supreme Administrative Court Decision of 1948/11/12
Supreme Administrative Court Decision of 1960/07/29
Superior Court of Justice Decision of 1970/10/23

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER.

[AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR JUDIC - ORG COMP TRIB.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CONST33 ART71 ART116. CP886 ART301. CPP29 ART93 PAR1. EJ62 ART399 ART402. CPC67 ART1516 ART1517 N2.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA DE 1948/11/12 IN COL AC PAG564. AC STA DE 1960/07/29 IN COL AC PAG803. AC STJ DE 1970/10/23 IN BMJ N200 PAG202.

[1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 606

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 0

[APENDICE] DG

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 06/05/1974

[DATA DO APENDICE] 01/27/1977

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00013518

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119750703009241

[OBJECTO] DESP MINJ.

[PAGINA] 0

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] CHAMPALIMAUD , ANTONIO

[RECORRIDO 1] MINJ

[REFERENCIA PUBLICACAO 1] AD N168 ANOXIV PAG1539

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/F0C7F56BEEFF8BA1802568FC003707BA?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Enferma do vicio de violação de lei, por erro nos pressupostos, o despacho que, invocando o prestigio do poder judicial, devido a desmandos cometidos numa audiencia, proibe o funcionamento do tribunal voluntario num tribunal judicial contra uma clausula do compromisso arbitral.

II - Uma vez eleito o tribunal judicial, ao abrigo dos artigos 1516 e 1517 do Codigo de Processo Civil, para o funcionamento do tribunal arbitral e sendo escolhido um arbitro para a preparação do processo, o prestigio da função judicial esta devidamente assegurado, porquanto aquele arbitro exerce jurisdição igual a do juiz de direito (artigo 1516, n. 2, do Codigo de Processo Civil).

III - Assim, o referido arbitro pode recorrer a força publica para prevenir ou reprimir quaisquer desmandos cometidos pelas partes, por força do disposto no artigo 154, n. 1, do Codigo de Processo Civil, com referencia ao paragrafo

1 do artigo 93 do Codigo de Processo Penal.