Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0421/11.3BEMDL AI generated

Administrative appeal dismissed because it merely reasserted defects without new arguments or evidence.

Case Number 0421/11.3BEMDL
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the administrative appeal lodged by the applicant against IFAP. The court found that the appeal failed to meet the cumulative requirements of Article 146(4) of the Administrative Procedure Code, as it neither constituted an impugnantive process nor presented new arguments beyond reasserting the original act's defects. Consequently, the court applied Article 145(2)(b) to reject the request for a new trial.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECLAMAÇÃO INDEFERIMENTO RECURSO FALTA DE CONCLUSÕES

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal impugnantive process reassertion of defects new arguments requirement CPTA procedural rules dismissal of appeal lack of novelty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 146(4) CPTA
O art. 146º, 4 do CPTA só é aplicável quando se verifiquem dois requisitos cumulativos: (i) estarmos perante um processo impugnatório; (ii) que o recurso se limitasse a reafirmar os vícios do acto, pelo que a não verificação de qualquer deles implica o indeferimento do recurso, por força do art.
Art. 145(2)(b) CPTA

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P24719

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1201906260421/11

[RECORRENTE] A...

[RECORRIDO 1] IFAP – INSTITUTO DE FINANCIAMENTO DA AGRICULTURA E PESCAS, IP

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/EE9155EC9E1B9F358025842B003B08FE?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O art. 146º, 4 do CPTA só é aplicável quando se verifiquem dois requisitos cumulativos: (i) estarmos perante um processo impugnatório; (ii) que o recurso se limitasse a reafirmar os vícios do acto, pelo que a não verificação de qualquer deles implica o indeferimento do recurso, por força do art. 145º, 2, b) do CPTA.