Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0164/12.0BELSB AI generated

Social security appeal dismissed because prior judgment on employment contract does not constitute binding precedent for annulment proceedings.

Case Number 0164/12.0BELSB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal regarding the annulment of part of the applicant's social security career. The court noted that while a prior judgment established an employment contract between the applicant and her employer, this ruling did not produce binding effect in the current annulment proceedings. Consequently, the court held that the exceptional rule allowing the review of factual findings did not apply, as the legal issue was already resolved in the earlier instance.

Legislator headnote

Official

APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR SEGURANÇA SOCIAL DECLARAÇÃO REMUNERAÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
social security annulment binding precedent effect employment contract recognition administrative procedure code exceptional factual review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 241.º n.º 1 do Código de Processo Administrativo
Art. 242.º do Código de Processo Administrativo

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P31131

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1202306150164/12

[RECORRENTE] AA

[RECORRIDO 1] INSTITUTO DA SEGURANÇA SOCIAL I.P.

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/EBAC6F789DB51FD7802589F80033240C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I – A sentença transitada que entendeu existir um contrato de trabalho entre a A. e a sua empregadora não produz caso julgado no processo onde se impugna o acto que anulou parte da sua carreira contributiva na segurança social.

I – Face ao modo aparentemente acertado como a questão jurídica foi decidida nas instâncias e à impossibilidade de na revista se sindicar a matéria de facto considerada provada, não se justifica quebrar a regra da excepcionalidade da sua admissão.