Legislator Case Law & Legislation
010140 AI generated

Administrative court rejects appeal when plaintiff wrongly targets delegate instead of delegator for own power acts.

Case Number 010140
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court rejected Jose Palmeirim's appeal against an act issued by the delegated Sanitation and Reclassification Commission. Palmeirim argued the act was invalid because it was attributed to the delegator rather than the delegate, seeking to challenge the delegator directly. The court held that when an entity exercises its own delegated powers, it acts as the proper defendant, making the appeal against the delegator inadmissible due to lack of passive legitimacy.

Legislator headnote

Official

DELEGAÇÃO DE PODERES COMPETENCIA PROPRIA ERRO NA IMPUTAÇÃO DO ACTO RECORRIDO LEGITIMIDADE PASSIVA REJEIÇÃO DO RECURSO CONTENCIOSO

Keywords

AI generated
delegation of powers passive legitimacy administrative act competence propria improper defendant administrative appeal rejection of recourse

Cited Legislation

AI generated
DL 124/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART2
[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 124/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART2 ART3.
DL 124/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART3
DL 123/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART3 N2
DL 123/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART3 N2.
L 5/75 DE 1975/03/14 ART6
L 5/75 DE 1975/03/14 ART6.
DL 117-A/76 DE 1976/02/09 ART1
DL 117-A/76 DE 1976/02/09 ART1.
RCR DE 1976/03/23 IN DG IIS 1976/03/31
RCR DE 1976/03/23 IN DG IIS 1976/03/31.
RSTA57 ART55 ART61
[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 124/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART2 ART3. DL 123/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART3 N2. L 5/75 DE 1975/03/14 ART6. DL 117-A/76 DE 1976/02/09 ART1. RCR DE 1976/03/23 IN DG IIS 1976/03/31. RSTA57 ART55 ART61. CADM40 ART835 ART840.
CADM40 ART835 ART840
[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 124/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART2 ART3. DL 123/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART3 N2. L 5/75 DE 1975/03/14 ART6. DL 117-A/76 DE 1976/02/09 ART1. RCR DE 1976/03/23 IN DG IIS 1976/03/31. RSTA57 ART55 ART61. CADM40 ART835 ART840.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STAP DE 1969/01/16 IN AD N90 PAG977
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STAP DE 1969/01/16 IN AD N90 PAG977.
AC STA DE 1976/04/08 IN AD N178 PAG1230
AC STA DE 1976/04/08 IN AD N178 PAG1230.
AC STA DE 1974/02/14 IN AD N151 PAG896
AC STA DE 1974/02/14 IN AD N151 PAG896.
AC STA DE 1971/10/21 IN AD N122 PAG167
AC STA DE 1971/10/21 IN AD N122 PAG167.
AC STA DE 1975/05/08 IN AD N164 PAG1097
AC STA DE 1975/05/08 IN AD N164 PAG1097.
AC STA PROC10103 DE 1977/04/21
AC STA PROC10103 DE 1977/04/21.
AC STA PROC10234 DE 1977/04/21
AC STA PROC10234 DE 1977/04/21.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER. DIR ADM CONT - ACTO.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 124/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART2 ART3. DL 123/75 DE 1975/03/11 ART3 N2. L 5/75 DE 1975/03/14 ART6. DL 117-A/76 DE 1976/02/09 ART1. RCR DE 1976/03/23 IN DG IIS 1976/03/31. RSTA57 ART55 ART61. CADM40 ART835 ART840.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STAP DE 1969/01/16 IN AD N90 PAG977. AC STA DE 1976/04/08 IN AD N178 PAG1230. AC STA DE 1974/02/14 IN AD N151 PAG896. AC STA DE 1971/10/21 IN AD N122 PAG167. AC STA DE 1975/05/08 IN AD N164 PAG1097. AC STA PROC10103 DE 1977/04/21. AC STA PROC10234 DE 1977/04/21.

[1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 955

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 0

[APENDICE] DR

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 06/23/1976

[DATA DO APENDICE] 07/10/1980

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00012290

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119770428010140

[OBJECTO] DEL COMIS DE ANALISE DE RECURSOS DE SANEAMENTO E RECLASSIFICAÇÃO DE 1976/05/24.

[PAGINA] 0

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] PALMEIRIM , JOSE

[RECORRIDO 1] COMIS DE ANALISE DE RECURSOS DE SANEAMENTO E RECLASSIFICAÇÃO DO CR

[REFERENCIA A DOUTRINA] MARCELLO CAETANO MANUAL DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO 10ED TI PAG226-227 PAG550. ANDRE GONÇALVES PEREIRA DA DELEGAÇÃO DE PODERES IN DIR ANO92 PAG108 PAG120-121 PAG130-131. ROBIN DE ANDRADE A REVOGAÇÃO DOS ACTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS PAG279 PAG313.

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/E732187CD2B4E776802568FC0036F396?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - A entidade delegada actua no exercicio de competencia propria.

II - Por isso, deve ser rejeitado, por ilegitimidade passiva, o recurso contencioso interposto de acto praticado no exercicio de competencia delegada, se o recorrente imputa a pratica do acto ao delegante e pede o chamamento deste ao recurso.